Mockpreps
🧑💼
🪴
Login now and master your exams with Mockpreps’ mock tests!
Top Interview Questions
In today’s fast-paced business environment, organizations are continually seeking ways to deliver high-quality products efficiently and respond to changing market demands. Agile methodologies have become the preferred approach to achieving these objectives, and within Agile, Scrum has emerged as one of the most widely adopted frameworks. At the heart of Scrum is a pivotal role that ensures the framework is implemented effectively—the Scrum Master. A Scrum Master is not merely a manager or a team leader but serves as a facilitator, coach, and servant-leader who enables teams to reach their full potential while adhering to Agile principles.
The Scrum Master is a key component of the Scrum framework, alongside the Product Owner and the Development Team. While the Product Owner focuses on defining and prioritizing the product backlog to maximize value, and the Development Team focuses on delivering the work, the Scrum Master ensures that the Scrum process is understood, followed, and continually improved.
The primary responsibility of a Scrum Master is to facilitate the Scrum process. This involves guiding the team through Scrum events, including Sprint Planning, Daily Stand-ups, Sprint Reviews, and Sprint Retrospectives. By ensuring that these ceremonies are productive and goal-oriented, the Scrum Master helps the team stay aligned and focused on delivering incremental value each sprint.
Moreover, a Scrum Master is a servant-leader, meaning their leadership style emphasizes support rather than command. They remove impediments that hinder team progress, encourage collaboration, and foster a culture of self-organization. Unlike traditional managers, Scrum Masters do not direct the work of the team but empower them to take ownership of their tasks while adhering to Agile principles.
Facilitating Scrum Events
The Scrum Master ensures that all Scrum events occur effectively. This includes:
Sprint Planning: Helping the team plan achievable sprint goals based on the product backlog and team capacity.
Daily Stand-ups: Guiding daily meetings to ensure they are time-boxed, focused, and efficient.
Sprint Review: Assisting in the demonstration of completed work to stakeholders and gathering feedback.
Sprint Retrospective: Leading sessions to reflect on past sprints, identify improvements, and implement changes.
Removing Impediments
Teams often encounter obstacles that prevent them from completing their work efficiently. A Scrum Master proactively identifies and removes these impediments, whether they are technical issues, organizational bottlenecks, or interpersonal conflicts. By doing so, they enable the team to maintain a steady flow of progress.
Coaching the Team in Agile Practices
One of the most critical roles of a Scrum Master is to coach team members and the organization in Agile principles and Scrum practices. This involves mentoring team members on self-organization, cross-functionality, and delivering value iteratively. The Scrum Master also educates stakeholders and management about Agile processes to ensure consistent support for the team.
Protecting the Team
Scrum teams often face pressure from external stakeholders to take on additional work or deviate from Agile principles. The Scrum Master acts as a shield, protecting the team from distractions and ensuring that the team focuses on the sprint goals and priorities set during planning.
Fostering Collaboration and Communication
A Scrum Master encourages open communication within the team and across the organization. They facilitate collaboration between team members, Product Owners, and other stakeholders to ensure transparency and alignment. This helps prevent misunderstandings, duplication of effort, and delays in project delivery.
Driving Continuous Improvement
Scrum is grounded in the concept of continuous improvement. A Scrum Master encourages the team to reflect on their processes regularly and implement incremental improvements. They analyze team performance, identify areas for enhancement, and guide the team toward better practices.
To be successful, a Scrum Master must possess a diverse set of skills, including:
Agile and Scrum Knowledge: Deep understanding of Agile principles and Scrum framework is essential. A Scrum Master must be capable of guiding the team and organization in adopting and practicing Scrum effectively.
Facilitation and Coaching Skills: The ability to facilitate discussions, resolve conflicts, and coach team members in Agile practices is crucial.
Servant Leadership: A Scrum Master must prioritize the needs of the team over their own authority, empowering the team to self-organize.
Problem-Solving: Identifying impediments and finding effective solutions requires strong analytical and problem-solving abilities.
Communication and Interpersonal Skills: Clear communication with team members, Product Owners, and stakeholders fosters transparency and trust.
Adaptability: Agile environments are dynamic, and a Scrum Master must be flexible and responsive to changing priorities and challenges.
A skilled Scrum Master can significantly enhance team performance and organizational agility. By facilitating effective Scrum ceremonies, removing impediments, and promoting a culture of continuous improvement, they enable teams to deliver high-quality products faster. They also help build a collaborative environment where team members feel empowered, motivated, and accountable for their work.
Moreover, the Scrum Master plays a vital role in bridging the gap between the team and stakeholders. By ensuring transparency, managing expectations, and promoting Agile practices across the organization, they contribute to more predictable delivery, better alignment with business goals, and higher customer satisfaction.
While the role is rewarding, it comes with several challenges:
Resistance to Change: Teams and organizations may resist adopting Agile practices, making it difficult for the Scrum Master to implement Scrum effectively.
Balancing Authority and Servant Leadership: A Scrum Master must lead without exerting formal authority, which can be challenging in hierarchical organizations.
Handling Impediments Beyond Control: Some obstacles, such as organizational bureaucracy or technical debt, may be beyond the Scrum Master’s immediate control.
Maintaining Team Engagement: Keeping the team motivated, especially during challenging sprints, requires patience and consistent effort.
Answer:
Scrum is an Agile framework used to manage and deliver projects iteratively and incrementally. It focuses on delivering value frequently, adapting to changes quickly, and encouraging collaboration. Scrum is commonly used in software development but can be applied in other domains as well.
Key Points:
Iterative and incremental delivery
Emphasizes transparency, inspection, and adaptation
Roles: Scrum Master, Product Owner, Development Team
Artifacts: Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment
Answer:
Scrum has three roles:
Scrum Master – Facilitates Scrum, removes impediments, ensures Scrum is followed
Product Owner – Defines product vision, manages the backlog, prioritizes work
Development Team – Self-organizing team responsible for delivering increments
Answer:
Facilitating Scrum events (Daily Standup, Sprint Planning, Sprint Review, Retrospective)
Coaching the team on Agile principles and Scrum practices
Removing blockers and impediments for the team
Ensuring effective communication between Product Owner and Development Team
Promoting a collaborative team environment
Protecting the team from external disruptions
Answer:
A Sprint is a time-boxed iteration in Scrum, usually 1–4 weeks, during which the team delivers a potentially shippable product increment.
Key Points:
Fixed duration
Focused on delivering value
Ends with a review and retrospective
Answer:
Product Backlog – Ordered list of all work for the product
Sprint Backlog – Selected items from Product Backlog for the Sprint
Increment – Working product at the end of the Sprint that meets the Definition of Done
Answer:
Sprint Planning – Defines what will be done in the Sprint and how
Daily Scrum (Standup) – 15-minute daily meeting for progress tracking
Sprint Review – Demonstrates work done, collects feedback
Sprint Retrospective – Discusses improvements for the next Sprint
The Sprint itself – The time-boxed period for development
Answer:
The Definition of Done is a shared understanding among the Scrum team of what it means for work to be considered complete.
Example:
Code implemented
Code reviewed
Unit tested
Deployed to staging
Answer:
An ordered list of all features, enhancements, bug fixes, and tasks for the product
Managed by the Product Owner
Continuously updated based on stakeholder feedback
Answer:
Items selected from the Product Backlog for the current Sprint
Includes tasks the team commits to delivering
Owned and updated by the Development Team
| Agile | Scrum |
|---|---|
| A methodology/principle for iterative development | A framework implementing Agile principles |
| Broad, includes multiple methodologies | Specific to Scrum rules, roles, and ceremonies |
| Focuses on values and principles | Focuses on roles, events, and artifacts |
Answer:
Defines the product vision
Prioritizes the Product Backlog
Ensures the team delivers maximum value
Acts as the bridge between stakeholders and the team
Answer:
Measure of work completed by a team in a Sprint
Helps in forecasting future Sprints
Calculated using story points, hours, or tasks completed
Answer:
Visual representation of work remaining versus time in a Sprint
Helps track progress and identify potential delays
Two types: Sprint Burndown and Release Burndown
Answer:
Short, simple descriptions of a feature from the end user’s perspective
Format: “As a [user], I want [feature] so that [benefit].”
Captures requirements in a clear, non-technical way
Answer:
Anything that blocks the team from achieving their Sprint goal
Scrum Master is responsible for removing or escalating impediments
| Scrum Master | Project Manager |
|---|---|
| Facilitator, Servant Leader | Decision-maker, authority |
| Focuses on team process | Focuses on project delivery |
| No direct control over team | Has direct control over team assignments |
| Removes obstacles | Assigns tasks |
Answer:
Meeting held at the end of the Sprint
Team reflects on what went well, what didn’t, and how to improve
Outcome: Actionable improvements for the next Sprint
Answer:
Observe and understand reasons (skill gaps, personal issues)
Encourage participation in standups and retrospectives
Offer support or coaching
Involve Product Owner if needed
Answer:
Visual tool to track tasks in a Sprint
Columns: To Do, In Progress, Done
Helps identify bottlenecks quickly
Answer:
Delivery of value in increments
Team productivity (velocity, quality)
Stakeholder satisfaction
Continuous improvement through retrospectives
Answer:
The sum of all Product Backlog items completed during a Sprint
Must be in a usable condition and meet the Definition of Done
Answer:
Discuss with Product Owner
Evaluate impact on Sprint Goal
Usually, scope is frozen during a Sprint, changes go to the next Sprint
| Scrum | Kanban |
|---|---|
| Time-boxed Sprints | Continuous flow |
| Prescribed roles and events | No roles or ceremonies required |
| Focuses on increments | Focuses on cycle time and flow |
| Team commits to work | Pull-based system, flexible |
Answer:
A scaled Scrum technique for multiple teams working on the same product
Representatives from each team meet to discuss progress and dependencies
Answer:
Keep it time-boxed to 15 mins
Focus on three questions:
What did I do yesterday?
What will I do today?
Any blockers?
Encourage concise updates and prevent problem-solving discussions
Answer:
Start with Scrum principles and roles
Explain ceremonies and artifacts clearly
Encourage self-organization
Guide rather than command
Use real examples and hands-on practice
Answer:
Scrum Master leads by serving the team
Focuses on removing obstacles, facilitating collaboration, and empowering team members
Unlike traditional leadership, does not command or control
Answer:
Listen to all parties without bias
Facilitate open discussions
Focus on issues, not individuals
Encourage compromise and agreement
Escalate if unresolved
Answer:
Ongoing process of clarifying and estimating Product Backlog items
Helps team understand requirements and prepare for Sprint Planning
Typically done once or twice per Sprint
Answer:
Recognize early signs (overtime, stress, low morale)
Encourage breaks, manageable workload, and realistic Sprint commitments
Discuss in Retrospectives and improve work processes
Promote a supportive work environment
Answer:
Protect the team by communicating with stakeholders
Educate on Scrum principles
Ensure Sprint Goal is not compromised
Facilitate negotiation between stakeholders and Product Owner
Answer:
Encourage Definition of Done
Promote Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Continuous integration and testing
Peer reviews and pair programming
Answer:
Jira
Trello
Azure DevOps
Rally
VersionOne
Answer:
Short Sprints reduce risk exposure
Frequent reviews allow early detection
Transparency allows immediate corrective actions
Answer:
Document questions for later
Encourage Product Owner to delegate a proxy
Make decisions based on team knowledge, if necessary
Ensure clarification in next backlog grooming session
Answer:
Recognize achievements
Encourage collaboration and ownership
Provide learning opportunities
Facilitate an open and safe environment
| Increment | Release |
|---|---|
| Potentially shippable product at Sprint end | Delivered product to users/customers |
| May not be deployed | Deployed to production |
| Adds value to Product Backlog | Represents cumulative business value |
Answer:
Analyze root causes in Retrospective
Adjust estimates, scope, or processes
Encourage realistic planning
Support team in continuous improvement
Answer:
Define Product Backlog with clear value items
Keep time-boxed Sprints
Facilitate regular meetings for feedback
Focus on iterative delivery and continuous improvement
Answer:
Communicate clearly about Scrum process
Involve them in Sprint Reviews
Manage expectations with Product Owner
Keep transparency and evidence of progress
| Scrum Master | Agile Coach |
|---|---|
| Focuses on one team | Works across multiple teams/org |
| Facilitates Scrum events | Guides Agile adoption & culture |
| Tactical role | Strategic & cultural role |
| Removes impediments | Coaches leaders and teams |
Answer:
A time-boxed research or investigation task
Used to reduce uncertainty or risk in backlog items
Outcome: Knowledge or prototype
| Waterfall | Scrum |
|---|---|
| Sequential process | Iterative & incremental |
| Changes costly | Embraces change |
| Documentation heavy | Value-driven |
| Late delivery of product | Frequent increments |
Answer:
Move incomplete items to Product Backlog
Discuss reasons in Retrospective
Learn and adjust planning for next Sprint
Answer:
Encourage skill sharing and learning
Avoid silos; promote collaboration
Facilitate pairing and mentorship
Support knowledge transfer
Answer:
Use digital tools (Zoom, Jira, Teams)
Schedule overlapping working hours
Ensure clear communication and documentation
Foster team bonding despite distance
Answer:
Five Scrum values:
Commitment – Focus on achieving goals
Courage – Take on challenges
Focus – Stay on priority
Openness – Share progress, obstacles
Respect – Value each team member
Answer:
Use Story Points, Planning Poker, T-shirt sizing
Team-driven estimates
Consider complexity, effort, risk
Answer:
Collaborative estimation technique
Team assigns story points to backlog items
Encourages discussion and consensus
Answer:
Conduct Sprint Retrospectives
Implement actionable items
Measure metrics (velocity, defects)
Encourage experimentation and learning
Answer:
Identify dependencies early
Scrum of Scrums meetings
Visualize dependencies on boards
Plan Sprints to minimize impact
Answer:
Checklist for backlog items to be ready for Sprint
Ensures clarity, estimates, acceptance criteria before Sprint Planning
Answer:
Collaborate with Product Owner to refine backlog
Use spikes to reduce uncertainty
Prioritize high-value items first
Answer:
Velocity trends
Sprint Goal achievement
Quality metrics (defects, rework)
Team engagement and satisfaction
Answer:
Educate stakeholders about Scrum process
Keep scope fixed during Sprint
Add changes to Product Backlog for next Sprint
Escalate persistent scope creep to Product Owner
Answer:
Scenario: At my previous organization, the team was new to Scrum and often skipped Daily Standups, resulting in miscommunication.
Solution: I conducted short workshops on Scrum principles, emphasized the importance of daily communication, and led by example. Within a few weeks, team participation improved and impediments were identified faster.
Answer:
Scenario: The Product Owner frequently requested changes that threatened the Sprint Goal.
Solution: I facilitated a discussion with the PO, explaining the impact on the team and Sprint commitments. We agreed to log changes in the Product Backlog for the next Sprint unless critical. This maintained focus while keeping flexibility for urgent changes.
Answer:
Scenario: Some developers were reluctant to attend Retrospectives or Daily Standups.
Solution: I scheduled one-on-one coaching sessions to understand concerns and shared real examples of Agile benefits. Gradually, by demonstrating value and involving them in decision-making, they became active participants.
Answer:
Scenario: Two teams were dependent on shared APIs, causing delays.
Solution: Introduced Scrum of Scrums, where representatives from each team met twice a week to track dependencies. We also visualized dependencies on Jira and planned Sprints to reduce bottlenecks.
Answer:
Scenario: Management demanded a high-volume release in a short timeframe.
Solution: Prioritized backlog items based on business value, ensured proper Definition of Done (DoD), and promoted Test-Driven Development (TDD). Frequent code reviews and automated tests reduced defects without delaying delivery.
Answer:
Scenario: The team couldn’t complete a high-complexity feature due to unclear requirements.
Solution: In the Retrospective, we analyzed root causes, identified gaps in requirements, and implemented better backlog refinement. I also suggested adding time-boxed spikes for unclear items. In subsequent Sprints, the team consistently met goals.
Answer:
Scenario: Two developers disagreed on the architecture approach.
Solution: I facilitated a meeting where each explained their viewpoint. We evaluated pros and cons together, aligned with business goals, and reached consensus. The key was focusing on the solution, not the person.
Answer:
Scenario: Velocity alone didn’t reflect quality or team collaboration.
Solution: I track Sprint Goal completion rate, defect density, cycle time, and team engagement metrics. Also, I collect stakeholder feedback during Sprint Reviews. This gives a holistic view of performance.
Answer:
Scenario: Stakeholders requested extra features mid-Sprint.
Solution: I reminded them of the Sprint Goal and the importance of focus. The extra work was added to the Product Backlog for prioritization in the next Sprint. Emphasized transparency in communication with management.
Answer:
Scenario: Team velocity was declining due to overcommitment.
Solution: Introduced realistic Sprint planning, clear DoD, and daily impediment tracking. I also organized knowledge-sharing sessions to improve skills. Productivity improved in the next two Sprints.
Answer:
Scenario: Retrospectives became monotonous and unproductive.
Solution: I introduced interactive formats like Start-Stop-Continue, Mad-Sad-Glad, and Fishbone diagrams to identify root causes. Rotated facilitation to keep engagement high. Actionable items were tracked and followed in subsequent Sprints.
Answer:
Scenario: The team was used to long documentation-heavy processes.
Solution: I conducted workshops on Agile values, started with pilot Sprints, and gradually introduced Scrum events. I emphasized incremental delivery and feedback loops. Over time, team confidence and productivity increased.
Answer:
Scenario: Developers lacked testing expertise.
Solution: Implemented pair programming, mentoring, and internal training sessions. Assigned tasks according to strengths while promoting cross-skilling. This built a more versatile, collaborative team.
Answer:
Scenario: A critical bug blocked progress on a feature.
Solution: I worked with the Product Owner to reprioritize Sprint Backlog items. The team addressed the bug first, ensuring business impact was minimized. Other items were deferred to the next Sprint, maintaining transparency with stakeholders.
Answer:
Scenario: Teams were in multiple time zones.
Solution:
Scheduled overlapping working hours
Used Jira, Zoom, and Miro for collaboration
Documented discussions for asynchronous follow-up
Encouraged virtual team-building sessions to maintain cohesion
Answer:
Scenario: The PO was frequently unavailable for clarifications.
Solution: Identified a proxy stakeholder to answer urgent questions. Documented all queries for PO review. Encouraged backlog refinement sessions to clarify requirements before Sprint Planning.
Answer:
Scenario: Release approvals were delayed due to external QA dependency.
Solution: I collaborated with QA leads to create a parallel testing pipeline and added automated checks. This reduced dependency bottlenecks and sped up delivery.
Answer:
Scenario: A critical production bug surfaced mid-Sprint.
Solution: Evaluated its priority with the PO. Paused low-priority tasks temporarily, assigned resources to fix the bug, and updated stakeholders. Other items were rescheduled for the next Sprint, keeping transparency intact.
Answer:
Facilitate Retrospectives with actionable items
Track metrics like defects, cycle time, and velocity trends
Encourage experimentation and learning from failures
Promote knowledge-sharing and cross-training
Answer:
Scenario: Two teams were working on overlapping features with different priorities.
Solution: Conducted a joint Sprint Planning and Scrum of Scrums session. Aligned on a common goal and clarified dependencies. Documented responsibilities to avoid conflict.
Answer:
Scenario: A stakeholder demanded constant updates and new features mid-Sprint.
Solution: Introduced transparent reporting via Jira dashboards, emphasized Sprint Goal importance, and involved the stakeholder in Sprint Reviews only. Reduced interruptions while maintaining engagement.
Answer:
Educate stakeholders about Scrum rules
Freeze Sprint scope once committed
Add new requests to Product Backlog
Use Sprint Reviews to showcase incremental delivery and gain feedback
Answer:
Scrum of Scrums
Shared dashboards (Jira, Confluence)
Regular cross-team alignment meetings
Encourage transparent reporting of dependencies
Answer:
Scenario: Initial Sprints were chaotic due to unclear requirements and lack of team commitment.
Solution: Conducted workshops on Agile values, redefined DoD, improved backlog refinement, and involved management in supporting Agile culture. Within 2 Sprints, team delivery stabilized.
Answer:
One-on-one discussion to understand challenges
Set clear expectations and goals
Provide mentorship or training
Involve HR if performance doesn’t improve
Encourage peer support without creating blame
Answer:
Shield team from distractions
Discuss with stakeholders to manage expectations
Prioritize work based on Sprint Goal
Escalate critical issues to Product Owner
Answer:
Use Scrum of Scrums to coordinate
Align Sprint Planning across teams
Track dependencies visually
Ensure shared understanding of Definition of Done
Answer:
Velocity trends
Burn-down and burn-up charts
Cycle time and lead time
Sprint Goal completion percentage
Defect density and team satisfaction
Answer:
Monitor overtime and stress levels
Rotate responsibilities to reduce monotony
Encourage breaks and manageable workload
Address issues in Retrospectives and adapt planning
Answer:
Conduct root cause analysis
Refine estimation process (Planning Poker, T-shirt sizing)
Improve backlog clarity and DoD
Encourage realistic commitment and incremental delivery
Answer:
Schedule overlapping working hours
Leverage tools for collaboration (Miro, Confluence, Jira)
Encourage asynchronous updates and documentation
Virtual team-building activities to strengthen bonds
Answer:
Facilitate by enforcing time-boxed updates
Encourage quieter members to speak
Rotate facilitation responsibilities
Remind team of Standup purpose: short status, not problem-solving
Answer:
Introduced parallel QA pipeline with automation
Collaborated with QA to improve process
Adjusted Sprint planning to account for QA dependency
Ensured visibility through dashboards
Answer:
Identify proxy stakeholder for immediate questions
Document decisions for PO review later
Ensure backlog refinement sessions are thorough
Answer:
Educate stakeholders about Sprint constraints
Negotiate priorities
Focus on delivering highest-value items first
Document changes for transparency
Answer:
Facilitate Retrospectives focused on wins and improvements
Celebrate small achievements
Introduce mentoring and learning sessions
Address root causes of failure systematically
Answer:
Identify dependencies during Sprint Planning
Track via Scrum of Scrums
Negotiate timelines with dependent teams
Visualize dependencies to improve coordination
Answer:
Provide training and hands-on sessions
Show benefits of tool through dashboards and reporting
Encourage feedback and iterative adoption
Gradually integrate tool into workflow
Answer:
Discuss importance of consistency and process adherence
Highlight benefits in Retrospectives
Involve leadership if necessary to enforce process
Lead by example
Answer:
Prioritize based on business value
Coordinate via Scrum of Scrums
Negotiate shared resource scheduling
Track impact on Sprint Goals
Answer:
Conduct workshops on Agile principles and benefits
Use metrics to show progress and value
Highlight transparency and risk mitigation
Share success stories and case studies
Answer:
Encourage decision-making within team
Remove impediments rather than assign tasks
Promote ownership and accountability
Facilitate learning opportunities
Answer:
Use historical velocity as reference
Educate team on realistic estimation
Limit tasks to capacity
Review overcommitment in Retrospective
Answer:
Prioritize defect fixes based on severity
Analyze root cause to prevent recurrence
Promote earlier testing in next Sprints (Shift-Left)
Answer:
Use frameworks like SAFe, LeSS, or Nexus
Scrum of Scrums to coordinate multiple teams
Standardize Definition of Done across teams
Align Product Owners and stakeholders
Answer:
Evaluate impact on Sprint Goal
Include only if critical
Add other items to next Sprint
Maintain transparency with stakeholders
Answer:
Reinforce importance of tracking for transparency
Provide training and templates
Lead by example and monitor compliance
Encourage accountability through daily review
Answer:
Prepare agenda with stakeholders in advance
Demonstrate tangible increments
Collect structured feedback
Use learnings to improve next Sprint
Answer:
Explain differences and benefits
Start with pilot Sprints
Gradually introduce roles, ceremonies, and artifacts
Track progress and adjust
Answer:
Prioritize release backlog items
Conduct release readiness checks
Coordinate QA, Dev, and Ops teams
Maintain communication with stakeholders
Answer:
Introduce story point estimation and Planning Poker
Conduct Retrospective to review estimation accuracy
Adjust velocity and expectations based on historical data
Answer:
Facilitate discussion focusing on business value and DoD
Encourage experimentation with spikes or prototypes
Document agreed approach
Review results in Retrospective
Answer:
Discuss with PO and team
Reprioritize based on Sprint Goal
Include in Sprint only if critical
Document deferred tasks
Answer:
Encourage video standups
Rotate facilitators
Schedule virtual team-building activities
Recognize contributions publicly
Answer:
Conduct Agile awareness sessions
Show pilot team results with metrics
Highlight improved delivery and transparency
Advocate for incremental adoption
